Cases 51 - 60 of 209
Shattil v. Fred Ricci Tool Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09497
Plaintiff:
Wendy Shattil
Defendant:
Fred Ricci Tool Co., Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Craters & Freighters Franchise Company v. Benz et al
as 1:2016cv02951
Plaintiff:
Craters & Freighters Franchise Company
Defendant:
Kathy Benz, Fred R. Benz, Tyler F. Benz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Power Places Tours, Inc. et al v. Free Spirit
as 1:2016cv02725
Plaintiff:
Power Places Tours, Inc. , Theresa Weiss and Fred Toby Weiss
Defendant:
Free Spirit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Fred's Inc.
as 3:2016cv00701
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Fred's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Sandow Fred Segal, LLC v. Cormackhill, LP
as 2:2016cv06653
Defendant:
Cormackhill, LP
Plaintiff:
Sandow Fred Segal, LLC
Feingold v. Daniello
as 1:2016cv06463
Plaintiff:
Deborah Feingold
Defendant:
Fred Daniello
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
NBA Properties, Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv07375
Plaintiff:
NBA Properties, Inc, NBA Properties, Inc., MLB Advanced Media, L.P. and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Yang Yan, A bi gai I and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
JFJ Toys, Inc., v. Genovese
as 0:2016cv61144
Plaintiff:
JFJ Toys, Inc. and Fred Ramirez
Defendant:
Don P. Genovese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sandow Fred Segal LLC v. Gregorys et al
as 2:2016cv03740
Defendant:
Gregorys and Jonathan Harris
Plaintiff:
Sandow Fred Segal LLC
PLUSH PUPS BOUTIQUE, LLC v. WESTON et al
as 2:2016cv02019
Plaintiff:
PLUSH PUPS BOUTIQUE, LLC
Defendant:
KRISTA WESTON , KRISTA'S FURRY TAILS GROOMING SALON, LLC , FRED WESTON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
