Cases 81 - 90 of 233
Cypress Lake Software, Inc. v. ZTE (USA) Inc.
as 6:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
Cypress Lake Software, Inc.
Defendant:
ZTE (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Deshodax LLC v. ZTE (USA), Inc.
as 5:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
Deshodax LLC
Defendant:
ZTE (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
InfoGation Corp. v. ZTE (USA), Inc.
as 3:2017cv00645
Plaintiff:
InfoGation Corp.
Defendant:
ZTE (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00124
Plaintiff:
Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA), Inc. and ZTE (TX), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
American GNC Corporation v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
American GNC Corporation
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc. and ZTE (TX) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
American GNC Corporation v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv00620
Plaintiff:
American GNC Corporation
Defendant:
ZTE (USA) Inc. and ZTE (TX) Inc.
Counter_claimant:
ZTE (TX) Inc.
Counter_defendant:
American GNC Corporation
Mediator:
James M Amend
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Cellular Communications Equipment LLC
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation, ZTE USA Inc., ZTE Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Display Technologies, LLC v. ZTE (USA) Inc.
as 2:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Display Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
ZTE (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Stoic Ventures LLC v. ZTE (USA) Inc.
as 2:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Stoic Ventures LLC
Defendant:
ZTE (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
IPA Technologies Inc. v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
IPA Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
