Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shaheryar Khan v. Adam Kraemer et al
as 2:2022cv02333
Plaintiff:
Shaheryar Khan
Defendant:
Adam Kraemer, Kent Seaton, Edward Charles Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Haynes Holding Group LLC v. ESR Performance Corp. et al
as 8:2021cv02033
Plaintiff:
Joshua Haynes Haynes Holding Group LLC and Haynes Holding Group LLC
Defendant:
ESR Performance Corp. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Haynes Holding Group LLC v. ESR Performance Corp. et al
as 2:2021cv09558
Plaintiff:
Joshua Haynes Haynes Holding Group LLC
Defendant:
ESR Performance Corp. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hempstract, Inc. v. Haynes et al
as 3:2021cv01171
Plaintiff:
Hempstract, Inc.
Defendant:
Gregory Haynes and Kim Melbye
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Roach v. Tate Publishing & Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2015at00489
Defendant:
Tate Publishing & Enterprises, LLC, Tate Music Group and Richard Tate
Plaintiff:
Terri Haynes Roach
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Roach v. Tate Publishing & Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00917
Defendant:
Tate Publishing & Enterprises, LLC , Tate Music Group and Richard Tate
Plaintiff:
Terri Haynes Roach
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Clarke Abbey et al v. Film Science LLC et al
as 2:2012cv07931
Plaintiff:
Clarke Abbey and Edward R Pressman Film Corporation
Defendant:
Lourenco Sant Anna, Alejandro De Leon, Larry Fessenden and others
Haynes Publishing Group PLC et al v. Protected Domain Services et al
as 2:2010cv04861
Defendant:
Does, Dwi Hermawanto and Protected Domain Services
Plaintiff:
Haynes Publications, Inc. and Haynes Publishing Group PLC
Scott Nathan v. 6126, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv03283
Defendant:
6126, LLC, Does, Sarah Haynes Heath and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Nathan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
