Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Tapestry, Inc. et al v. Rigdon et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Tapestry, Inc., Coach Services, Inc. and Kate Spade, LLC
Defendant:
Jo Ann Sanders Rigdon, Sheri E. Sanders Smith, The Pink Daisy Market, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
El v. Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC et al
as 3:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
Nanya Akufu El behalf of doing business as Nanya Akufu El
Defendant:
Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, Christopher E. Schaefer and Chadler M. Hardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. v. RDJ Internet & Social Media, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00496
Defendant:
Innovative Computer Specialists Corp., Ronnie E. Needham, RDJ Internet & Social Media, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
N. Harris Computer Corporation et al v. DSI Investments, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00142
Defendant:
David C. Ogles, Digitech Services, Inc., DSI Investments, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
N. Harris Computer Corporation, Colossus, Inc. and InterAct911 Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Hobbs et al
as 0:2018cv00120
Defendant:
Timothy E. Poe, Carrie S. Hobbs and Susey and Tim, LLC
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Burcor Fencing, LLC et al v. Burcor 1 Fencing Distributors LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Burcor Fencing, LLC , Robert J. Burch and Maranatha Burch
Defendant:
Burcor 1 Fencing Distributors LLC , Howie Dunnit LLC, Anthony Ruehl and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Truck and Auto Extras, LLC et al v. Sanders
as 5:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Truck and Auto Extras, LLC and George W. N. Clay
Defendant:
Barry E. Sanders
Counter_claimant:
Barry E. Sanders
Counter_defendant:
George W. N. Clay and Truck and Auto Extras, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
