Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Windom v. Brady et al
as 5:2019cv02045
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Alan C. Nelson, Dick Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
I & O Publishing Co., Neo-Tech Research Writing Center and Cameron O. Windom
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ECi Macola/MAX, LLC v. Leahy Consulting, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00719
Plaintiff:
ECi Macola/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Leahy Consulting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Northrop and Johnson Holding Company, Inc. v. Leahy et al
as 0:2016cv63008
Plaintiff:
Northrop and Johnson Holding Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Caryn Leahy and Northrop and Johnson Yacht Charters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc v. Training Consultants LLC et al
as 8:2012cv01385
Plaintiff:
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc
Defendant:
Christina Leahy, Donald Leahy, Elizabeth Leahy and others
Joelsongs et al v. Famous, LLC, The et al
as 1:2007cv00065
Plaintiff:
Joelsongs, Joelsongs, Warner Bros., Inc. and others
Defendant:
Famous, LLC, The, Anthony F. Leahy, Cynthia Gough and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Carter Bryant v. Mattel Inc
as 2:2004cv09049
Petitioner:
Fred Mashian, Anna Rhee, Donald K Moon and others
Counter Defendant:
Omni 808 Investors, LLC, IGWT 826 Investments LLC, MGA ENTERTAINMENT INC., INTERVENOR RE: CV04-09059 and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Lexington Insurance Company, Crum and Forster Specialty Insurance Company, Chartis Specialty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Carter Bryant
Interested Party:
O'Melveny & Myers LLP, -, Tiongco, Neil Kadisha and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Anne Wang
Receiver:
Patrick A Fraioli
Material Witne:
Mariana Trueba
Defendant:
Mattel Inc
Special Master:
Hon James L. Smith and Robert C O'Brien
Not Classified By Court:
International Corporate Advisors, LLC, Maria M Bashaw and Littler Mendelson APC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
