Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Prokos v. United Capital Investments Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01048
Plaintiff:
Andrew K Prokos
Defendant:
United Capital Investments Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Andrews v. Beck
as 3:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Philip Andrews
Defendant:
John Thomas Beck
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld and Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv01305
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv01223
Counter Defendant:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv01226
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv01185
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
