Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Contego Spa Designs, Inc. v. Soho Nails Spa LLC
as 4:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Contego Spa Designs, Inc.
Defendant:
Soho Nails Spa LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Combat Veterans Motorcycle Association v. GearLaunch, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
Combat Veterans Motorcycle Association
Defendant:
GearLaunch, Inc., Thatcher Claflin Spring and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Falling Prices, Inc. v. Falling Prices, LLC
as 4:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
FALLING PRICES, INC.
Defendant:
FALLING PRICES, LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Johnson v. St. Louis Chinese News, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01855
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson
Defendant:
St. Louis Chinese News, Inc. and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Philpot v. Answers.com Corporation
as 4:2018cv00705
Plaintiff:
Larry G. Philpot
Defendant:
Answers.com Corporation and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Philpot v. The St. Louis Post Dispatch LLC
as 4:2018cv00704
Plaintiff:
Larry G. Philpot
Defendant:
The St. Louis Post Dispatch LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al
as 4:2016cv01271
Plaintiff:
ME2 Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
SI03, Inc. v. Musclegen Research, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00274
Plaintiff:
SI03, Inc.
Defendant:
Musclegen Research, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Everidis Health Sciences, LLC. v. 123 Direct LTD et al
as 4:2016cv01729
Plaintiff:
Everidis Health Sciences, LLC.
Defendant:
123 Direct LTD, Jeremy Michael Rourke-Pilott, Jose Manuel Mendez Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Vision Films, Inc. v. Does 1-10
as 4:2013cv00290
Plaintiff:
Vision Films, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
