Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Dirahn Gilliams v. Universal Music Group, et al
as 23-2466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIRAHN DENNIS GILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP
Defendant:
CASH MONEY RECORDS, JAMES SCHEFFER and DWAYNE CATER
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Hole in the Wall Bar, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Hole in the Wall Bar LLC d/b/a Hole in the Wall, John H White, Sean C Gilliam and others
Not Classified By Court:
Gregory P. Holder
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
GILLIAMS v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP et al
as 2:2022cv03889
Plaintiff:
DIRAHN DENNIS GILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, CASH MONEY RECORDS, JAMES SCHEFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Richemont International SA et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv07183
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA , Cartier International A.G. , Montblanc-Simplo GMBH and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Xiong Hua Ping, A-cast Vogue Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Franco Fasoli et al v. Voltage Pictures LLC et al.
as 2:2015cv00889
Defendant:
AMPLIFY RELEASING, TERENCE VANCE GILLIAM, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Franco Fasoli, DEREK SHAMUS MEHAFFEY and Nicolas Santiago Romero Escalada
Fasoli et al v. Voltage Pictures LLC et al.
as 1:2014cv06206
Plaintiff:
Franco Fasoli , Nicolas Santiago Romero Escalada and Derek Shamus Mehaffey
Defendant:
Voltage Pictures, LLC, The Zanuck Co., Mediapro Pictures and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
GILLIAMS v. CARTER et al
as 2:2010cv01914
Plaintiff:
DIRAHN GILLIAMS
Defendant:
DWAYNE MICHAEL CARTER, DARIUS HARRISON, JAMES SCHEFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
