Cases 1 - 10 of 44
CRAMER v. NETFLIX, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
MOLLY CRAMER
Defendant:
NETFLIX, INC. and ROYAL GOODE PRODUCTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
JTH TAX LLC et al v. PIASCINSKI et al
as 5:2022cv01455
Defendant:
TINA PIASCINSKI, MICHAEL PIASCINSKI, TINA TRIMBLE and others
Plaintiff:
JTH TAX LLC doing business as LIBERTY TAX SERVICE and SIEMPRETAX+ LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
SIEMPRETAX+ LLC et al v. PIASCINSKI et al
as 2:2022cv01454
Plaintiff:
SIEMPRETAX+ LLC and JTH TAX LLC D/B/A LIBERTY TAX SERVICE
Defendant:
MICHAEL PIASCINSKI, TINA PIASCINSKI and IT'S ALL GOOD BUSINESS LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC. et al v. OVERTIME SPORTS, INC.
as 2:2020cv01195
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN SPORTS LICENSING, LLC and DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC.
Defendant:
OVERTIME SPORTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
H.J. HEINZ COMPANY BRANDS LLC v. REAL GOOD FOOD COMPANY, LLC
as 2:2019cv00915
Plaintiff:
H.J. HEINZ COMPANY BRANDS LLC
Defendant:
REAL GOOD FOOD COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
FISHER et al v. GOODE SKI TECHNOLOGIES
as 2:2016cv04213
Defendant:
GOODE SKI TECHNOLOGIES
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. FISHER and DENNIS V. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
GOOD MAN PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. DOE
as 2:2015cv00809
Plaintiff:
GOOD MAN PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
GOOD MAN PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. DOE
as 2:2015cv00800
Plaintiff:
GOOD MAN PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
GOOD MAN PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. JOHN DOE
as 2:2015cv00791
Plaintiff:
GOOD MAN PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
GOOD MAN PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. DOE
as 2:2015cv00799
Plaintiff:
GOOD MAN PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
