Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Implus Footcare, LLC v. Dayline Innovations Inc.
as 3:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
Implus Footcare, LLC
Defendant:
Dayline Innovations Inc. and Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj Declaratory Judgment
Implus Footcare, LLC. v. Dries et al
as 1:2020cv01529
Defendant:
Hello Medical, Inc., Greg Van Den Dries and Rouge Medical, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Implus Footcare, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Buyer's Direct Inc. v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00597
Plaintiff:
Buyer's Direct Inc.
Defendant:
Implus Footcare, LLC, Unknown retailers who purchase infringing products from Implus Footcare LLC, HIBBETT SPORTING GOODS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ENI-JR286, Inc. v. Implus Footcare, LLC
as 2:2017cv05181
Defendant:
Implus Footcare, LLC
Plaintiff:
ENI-JR286, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Implus Footcare, LLC v. Sequential Brands Group, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Implus Footcare, LLC
Defendant:
Sequential Brands Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Implus Footcare, LLC v. Maverick Sports Medicine, Inc. d/b/a Pro-Tec Athletics
as 5:2015cv00659
Plaintiff:
Implus Footcare, LLC
Defendant:
Maverick Sports Medicine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Implus Footcare, LLC v. Pivotal 5, LLC
as 5:2015cv00658
Plaintiff:
Implus Footcare, LLC
Defendant:
Pivotal 5, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Implus Footcare, LLC v. Brooklyn Body, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00548
Plaintiff:
Implus Footcare, LLC
Defendant:
Brooklyn Body, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Implus Footcare, LLC v. Fantabulous World Products
as 5:2015cv00550
Plaintiff:
Implus Footcare, LLC
Defendant:
Fantabulous World Products
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Implus Footcare, LLC v. Vandue Corporation
as 5:2015cv00554
Plaintiff:
Implus Footcare, LLC
Defendant:
Vandue Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
