Cases 1 - 10 of 16
mCom IP, LLC v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 1:2023cv08793
Plaintiff:
mCom IP, LLC
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1341 Patent Infringement
Auth Token LLC v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 1:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
Auth Token LLC
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
First-Class Monitoring, LLC v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 1:2017cv01578
Plaintiff:
First-Class Monitoring, LLC
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ectolink, LLC v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 6:2015cv00752
Plaintiff:
Ectolink, LLC
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 1:2015cv02167
Plaintiff:
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Automated Transactions LLC v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 1:2014cv00506
Plaintiff:
Automated Transactions LLC
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Counter_claimant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Counter_defendant:
Automated Transactions LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Automated Transactions LLC v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 1:2013cv01155
Plaintiff:
Automated Transactions LLC
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Actuate Corporation v. NCR Corporation et al
as 5:2013cv03494
Plaintiff:
Actuate Corporation
Defendant:
NCR Corporation and M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 1:2013cv01274
Plaintiff:
Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Pi-Net International Inc. v. Wilmington Trust Company et al
as 1:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Pi-Net International Inc.
Defendant:
Wilmington Trust Company and M & T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
