Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Duffy Archive Limited v. Wine and Design Franchise LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00494
Plaintiff:
Duffy Archive Limited
Defendant:
Wine and Design Franchise LLC and Harriet Edwards Mills
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
AVANT GARDE MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC. et al v. COASTAL RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00096
Plaintiff:
AVANT GARDE MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC. , FLYTE TYME TUNES , UH OH ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Defendant:
COASTAL RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC and ROCCO SCARFONE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Patrick Yarn Mill, Inc. v. Pureplay, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00280
Plaintiff:
Patrick Yarn Mill, Inc.
Defendant:
Pureplay, LLC, Playback, LLC and Adam Siskind
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Morgardshammar, Inc. v. Dynamic Mill Services Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00379
Plaintiff:
Morgardshammar, Inc.
Defendant:
Dynamic Mill Services Corporation, Ernesto Bosch, Keith Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Les Mills International Limited v. Grant et al
as 4:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
Les Mills International Limited, Les Mills International Limited and Les Mills International Limited
Defendant:
David Grant, Erik Heck and Margie Heck
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mill Creek Post & Beam Co. v. Goshen Timber Frames, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00283
Plaintiff:
Mill Creek Post & Beam Co. and Mill Creek Post & Beam Co.
Defendant:
Goshen Timber Frames, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mill Creek Post & Beam Company v. Gillen et al
as 1:2008cv00201
Plaintiff:
Mill Creek Post & Beam Company
Defendant:
Brian Gillen, Julie Gillen, The Rimer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WRIGHTENBERRY HOISERY MILLS, INC. v. EDGE MARKETING SALES, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00968
Plaintiff:
WRIGHTENBERRY HOSIERY MILLS, INC.
Defendant:
EDGE MARKETING SALES, INC. and EDGE MARKETING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
