Cases 1 - 10 of 182
Shenzhen Gaiyatuopu Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associates Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv05111
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Gaiyatuopu Network Technology Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associates Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Yeti Coolers, LLC v. Shenzhen Weinan Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Yeti Coolers, LLC
Defendant:
Shenzhen Weinan Network Technology Co., Ltd. doing business as Wenanbeino, Shenzhen Muqi Network Technology Co., Ltd. doing business as Kedauud, Wuhan Wantaiyou Information Technology Co., Ltd. doing business as Htnyhtn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Chengdu Ruihan Yongtai Trading Co., Ltd. et al v. Aaron Chien et al
as 2:2024cv04379
Plaintiff:
Chengdu Ruihan Yongtai Trading Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou Chonger Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Guigang Tianshi Trading Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Aaron Chien, Te-Ju Chien, Hsin-Yi Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
KANDI BAR, LLC v. SHENZHEN XIANGSHA NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2024cv01393
Plaintiff:
KANDI BAR LLC
Defendant:
SHENZHEN XIANGSHA NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD and CHEN XIAOLI
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Chrome Hearts LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Chrome Hearts LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Chang 'an Lang Mai Lun Hardware Business Department, Guangzhou Jixian Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Peanuts Worldwide LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Peanuts Worldwide LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Changde Juhetai Craft Gift Limited, Dongguan Art Kitchenware Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
River Light V, L.P. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv03089
Plaintiff:
River Light V, L.P.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, parsimonious, Yolo_apo_s Life Boutique and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
NS International Textiles v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A
as 1:2024cv03038
Plaintiff:
NS International Textiles
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, Halife, Viottiset and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Merch Traffic, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv03028
Plaintiff:
Merch Traffic, LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Chengdu Heqiuli Clothing Co., Ltd., Dongguan Bu'an Clothing Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Akerson Enterprises LLC v. Shenzhen Conglin E-Commerce Co Ltd et al
as 2:2024cv00506
Defendant:
Shenzhen Lute Innovations Technology Co., Ltd. formerly known as Shenzhen Lutejiacheng Network Technology Co., Ltd. also known as Shenzhen Lutejiacheng Technology, Co., Ltd. also known as Shenzhen Root Technology Co. Ltd. also known as Shenzhen Root, Shenzhen Conglin E-Commerce Co., Ltd (dba Smartlin), Shenzhen Lutejiacheng Network Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Akerson Enterprises, LLC dba Kindred Bravely and Akerson Enterprises LLC doing business as Kindred Bravely
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
