Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ERLWEIN et al v. WATLINGTON et al
as 1:2013cv00986
Plaintiff:
THEODORE ERLWEIN and HIGH SIERRA CONSULTING, LLC
Defendant:
ROBBIN EUGENE WATLINGTON , HLC GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. and RAYMOND ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising, LLC et al v. WHD Enterprises, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00656
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising, LLC , DD IP Holder, LLC , Baskin-Robbins Franchising, LLC and others
Defendant:
WHD Enterprises, LLC, AND Enterprises, LLC and Waheed Dode
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops, LLC v. The Harger Company, et al
as 5:2012cv00253
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops, LLC
Defendant:
The Harger Company and Roberta Kay Harger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops, LLC v. The Harger Company et al
as 4:2012cv00085
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops, LLC
Defendant:
The Harger Company and Roberta Kay Harger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants, LLC et al v. Naman Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00019
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants, LLC , Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC , DD IP Holder, LLC and others
Defendant:
Naman Enterprises, Inc. , Rachana, Inc. , Manoj Rawal and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC v. The Harger Company et al
as 5:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC
Defendant:
The Harger Company and Roberta Kay Harger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops, LLC v. Garner
as 4:2009cv00007
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops, LLC
Defendant:
Melvin B. Garner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Baskin-Robbins USA, Co. v. The Harger Company et al
as 5:2007cv00274
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins USA, Co.
Defendant:
The Harger Company and Roberta Kay Harger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
