Cases 1 - 10 of 20
United Access Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Corp.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 21-2002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T CORP., AT&T SERVICES, INC., SBC INTERNET SERVICES, INC. and others
AIP Acquisition LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00513
Plaintiff:
AIP Acquisition LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. , AT&T Mobility LLC , SBC Internet Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2013cv01631
Defendant:
New Cingular Wireless Services Inc., Wayport Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Intellectual Ventures II LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. AT&T Corp.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2013cv00116
Counter Plaintiff:
AT&T Communications of Texas, LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Operations, Inc. and others
Defendant:
AT&T Communications of Texas, LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Intellectual Ventures II LLC
Plaintiff:
Intellectual Ventures II LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
AF Holdings, LLC, et al v. Does, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-7135
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AF Holdings, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
Does, 1 - 1058
Interested Party - Appellant:
Cox Communications, Inc., Verizon Online, LLC, SBC Internet Services, Inc., doing business as AT&T Internet Services and others
Driden Multicommunications LLC v. AT & T Inc. et al.
as 1:2012cv01469
Plaintiff:
Driden Multicommunications LLC
Defendant:
AT & T Inc., AT&T Corp. and SBC Internet Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Unified Messaging Solutions LLC v. Google Inc et al
![Featured Case Featured Case](https://static.justia.com/images/icons/star.png)
as 1:2012cv06292
Plaintiff:
Unified Messaging Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Google Inc , AOL Inc. , AT&T Services, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
Unified Messaging Solutions LLC , AT&T Mobility LLC , SBC Internet Services, Inc., d/b/a AT&T Internet Services and others
Counter_claimant:
Conn's Inc. , Conn Appliances, Inc. , Time Warner Cable Inc., and others
Mediator:
James Knowles
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2012cv02494
Plaintiff:
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Corp and SBC Internet Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
In Re: Bear Creek Technologies Inc. ('722) Patent Litigation
as 1:2012md02344
Counter Claimant:
Qwest Communications International Inc., Mediacom Broadband LLC, 8x8, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Charter Communications Inc., Media Broadcom, LLC, Cox Communications Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Bear Creek Technologies Inc. ('722) Patent Litigation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al
![Featured Case Featured Case](https://static.justia.com/images/icons/star.png)
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 6:2012cv00283
Plaintiff:
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Corp. and SBC Internet Services, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
AT&T Corp. and SBC Internet Services, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.