Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Whirlpool Corporation et al v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule A
as 0:2023cv61923
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Corporation, Whirlpool Properties, Inc. and Maytag Properties, LLC
Defendant:
The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule A, venusfilter, Wrapango.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
DAVALOS et al v. WIL-DAM CORP.
as 2:2022cv01798
Plaintiff:
CAMILLA DAVALOS, TARA LEIGH PATRICK, CIELO JEAN GIBSON and others
Defendant:
WIL-DAM CORP. d/b/a SHAKERS GOGO and WIL-DAM CORP. doing business as SHAKERS GOGO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
SinglePoint Direct Solar LLC et al v. Curiel et al
as 2:2021cv01076
Defendant:
Pablo Diaz Curiel, Brian Odle, Kjelsey Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
SinglePoint Direct Solar LLC
Consolidated Defendant:
SinglePoint Incorporated, Greg Lambrecht, Wil Ralston and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Pablo Diaz, Jagusa Holdings Incorporated, Dan Shikiar and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Richemont International SA et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv04996
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA, Chloe S.A.S., Van Cleef & Arpels SA and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Larry Suits, longfakehandbags.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
CHANEL, INC. v. ADAMS DANIELLE et al
as 0:2017cv61127
Plaintiff:
CHANEL, INC.
Defendant:
ADAMS DANIELLE, AIN ROA, Alana Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Mark Travel Corp v. Maxwell, et al
as 1:2001cv04643
Plaintiff:
Mark Travel Corporation, The
Defendant:
William Maxwell and Wil Maxwell Web Design
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
