Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MadVapes Franchising, LLC v. American Vapes, Inc et al
as 5:2019cv00037
Plaintiff:
MadVapes Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Craig Kinlaw, Bryan Hough, Wayne Kinley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc. et al v. Various John and Jane Does et al
as 3:2012cv00104
Plaintiff:
National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc. , Motorsports Authentics, LLC , Speedway Motorsports, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Various John and Jane Does, Various XYZ Corporations, Wayne Sherin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
CANON U.S.A., INC. v. FREEMAN et al
as 1:2010cv00642
Plaintiff:
CANON U.S.A., INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL FREEMAN and WAYNE VAN FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Davis v. Caldwell et al
as 1:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Hattie Caldwell Davis
Defendant:
Wayne T Caldwell and Random House, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
EMI APRIL MUSIC INC. et al v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2009cv00432
Plaintiff:
EMI APRIL MUSIC INC., YELAPA SONGS, UNIVERSAL-POLYGRAM INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING, INC. and others
Defendant:
ESTUARDO VALDEMAR RODRIGUEZ and LEONOR RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. J&L Main,Inc.
as 4:2007cv00115
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., SONY/ATV SONGS LLC d/b/a SONY/ATV ACUFF ROSE MUSIC, JOHN BIENSTOCK d/b/a JOHNNY BIENSTOCK MUSIC and others
Defendant:
J&L MAIN, INC., JOHN E. MAIN and ALICIA C. MAIN
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. J & L MAIN, INC. d/b/a GOLDEN MARGARITAS et al
as 4:2007cv00084
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., SONY/ATV SONGS LLC d/b/a SONY/ATV ACUFF ROSE MUSIC, JOHN BIENSTOCK d/b/a JOHNNY BIENSTOCK MUSIC and others
Defendant:
J & L MAIN, INC. d/b/a GOLDEN MARGARITAS and JOHN E. MAIN and ALICIA C. MAIN, each individually
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
