Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SIMMONS v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP et al
as 2:2021cv20449
Plaintiff:
TYRONE SIMMONS
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INTERSCOPE RECORDS, DEF JAM RECORDINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Simmons v. Stanberry et al
as 12-1665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tyrone Simmons
Defendant - Appellee:
William C. Stanberry, Jr., AKA Apex, Curtis Jackson, AKA 50 cent, Universal Music Group and others
Wu-Tang Production, Inc. v. Korsch et al
as 1:2011cv06475
Plaintiff:
Wu-Tang Production, Inc.
Defendant:
Hajo Korsch, Ascio Technologies, Inc., John Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
STOKES v. STEPHENS et al
as 2:2011cv03849
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STOKES
Defendant:
JOHN STEPHENS, SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, COLUMBIA RECORDS and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Simmons v. Stanberry et al
as 1:2010cv05815
Defendant:
Aftermath Entertainment, Apex Productions, LLC, G-Unit Records and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Simmons
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hardy Way, LLC., et al. v. TM Perfumes Wholesale, Inc., et al.
as 4:2010cv02735
Plaintiff:
Hardy Way, LLC. and Audigier Brand Management Group, LLC.
Defendant:
TM Perfumes Wholesale, Inc., Virender K. Sharma, Perfumes Club South, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Danko Oldham et al v. Universal Music Group et al
as 1:2009cv07385
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Daryle Danko Oldham, Benjamin Daryle Danko Oldham, Johnnie R. Simmons, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Universal Music Group, Universal Music Publishing, Inc., Interscope Records, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Cartier International, N.V. et al v. Aldo U.S. inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02607
Plaintiff:
Cartier International, N.V., Cartier International, N.V., Cartier Creation Studios, S.A. and others
Defendant:
Aldo U.S. inc., XYZ Corporations 1-20 and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
