Cases 221 - 230 of 9,579
CONRAD v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
MARTHA CONRAD
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Wiggins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Darnell Nicolle Wiggins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
NORRIS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
TASHA LYNNE NORRIS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DAVIS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAVIS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
ETHERIDGE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00978
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ETHERIDGE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
HARDEN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
SUMMER HARDEN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
POWELL v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00950
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE POWELL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
THAXTON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00979
Plaintiff:
Taneisha Thaxton
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Green v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv01234
Plaintiff:
Darnell Green
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Frye v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Andrea Carol Frye
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
