Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Taylor-Banks v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv00984
Plaintiff:
Catherine Taylor-Banks
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Taylor v. Astrue (CONSENT)
as 2:2008cv00971
Plaintiff:
Loretta Taylor, Loretta Taylor, Loretta Taylor and others
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taylor v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2008cv02120
Plaintiff:
Gola Faye Taylor
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Taylor v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2008cv02049
Plaintiff:
Marshall Taylor
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Taylor v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2008cv01900
Plaintiff:
Linda F. Taylor
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Taylor v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2008cv01386
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ann Taylor
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Taylor v. Astrue(CONSENT)
as 1:2008cv00512
Plaintiff:
Kathi A. Taylor
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Taylor v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 4:2008cv00836
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Taylor v. Astrue
as 1:2007cv00768
Plaintiff:
Ralph Taylor, III
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taylor v Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 5:2007cv01549
Plaintiff:
Melissa B. Taylor and Melissa B. Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
