Cases 51 - 60 of 9,620
Nelson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Chad Nelson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSDC)
TEPEDINO v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
ALLISON TEPEDINO
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
ORELLANA v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
ERNEST ORELLANA
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Lane v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Billy Lane, Jr and Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
FONTE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
DENNIS FONTE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Harris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moore v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Carol Moore
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dunn v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Dunn
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Brite v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Eric Brite
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Herrmann v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Laura Herrmann
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
