Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Monath v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Daniel Heath Monath
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Frazier v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03175
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniel Frazier
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Daniel Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Shinn v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Shinn
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Damon Jr. v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Daniel G. Damon Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Daniel v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Daniel
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Flanigan v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Daniel Flanigan
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Bowen v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv01258
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bryan Bowen
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pursell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv01019
Plaintiff:
Danielle Pursell
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Daniels v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01773
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Linda A. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
