Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Marshall v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv11431
Plaintiff:
Robert E Marshall and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McDermott et al v. Kilolo Kijakazi Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv11173
Plaintiff:
Michael Peter McDermott, James LaMontagne and Karl E. Osterhout
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McNamara v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv11038
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. McNamara and Karl E. Osterhout
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Alemayehu v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2022cv10008
Plaintiff:
Abeiy E Alemayehu
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mahoney v. Kijakazi et al
as 1:2021cv10992
Plaintiff:
Brian E. Mahoney
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cabral v. Saul
as 1:2021cv10049
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Cabral, III
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Pelkey v. Saul et al
as 1:2019cv11479
Plaintiff:
Scott E Pelkey
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Adminstration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Millen v. Berryhill et al
as 1:2018cv11018
Plaintiff:
Sharon E Millen
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Srybny v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv10707
Plaintiff:
Michael E Srybny, Sr
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clagon v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv10415
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Frank E. Clagon
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
