Cases 1 - 10 of 9,614
Moody v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Moody
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSDC)
Albert v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Arthur Albert
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Hampton v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Housoni Hampton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Crews v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Crews
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
STARNES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
RACQEL STARNES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CHESNEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN ELIZABETH CHESNEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CHAPPELLE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
RONDA CHAPPELLE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Stewart v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Deon Stewart
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Handy v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Yvette Handy
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Eden v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Matthew Eden
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
