Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Bailey v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv01942
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Terri Bailey
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Bailey v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv00132
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Damotress Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Bailey v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv00473
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Damotress Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Bailey v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv01107
Plaintiff:
Veronica M Bailey
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill and Nancy Ann Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Bailey v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00107
Plaintiff:
Veronica M Bailey
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Bailey v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv01669
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill and United States Attorney's Office
Plaintiff:
Jason Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Bailey v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00539
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Damotress Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Bailey v. Texas Dept of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2017cv01434
Plaintiff:
Michael Jon Bailey
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Health and Human Services and United States Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv01536
Plaintiff:
John R. Bailey
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Bailey v. Colvin
as 4:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
Sonji Sanders Bailey
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
