Cases 1 - 10 of 35
DARBY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR DONALD DARBY, JR.
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Janney v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Janney
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Meeks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Torran Donald Meeks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lock v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Donald Lock
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Lester Donald Cook
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WILMOTH v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00217
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
DONALD WILMOTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Meeks v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00261
Plaintiff:
Torran Donald Meeks
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00676
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
DONALD WADE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Sills v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00109
Plaintiff:
Donald Sills
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Williams v. Saul
as 5:2019cv00362
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Donald Lenell Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
