Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Miguel Gonzalo Jimenez v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03857
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL GONZALO JIMENEZ
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rivera Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv07841
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Rivera Garcia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Gonzalo Arturo Bazan Urmeneta v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00865
Plaintiff:
GONZALO ARTURO BAZAN URMENETA
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jesse Gonzalo Uribe v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2021cv04680
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Jesse Gonzalo Uribe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rivera Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2020cv07201
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Rivera Garcia
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gonzalo Moreno Alcaraz v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2020cv06703
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Moreno Alcaraz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gonzalo D. Hernandez v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2019cv06800
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo D. Hernandez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soci Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Talamantes v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00140
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Talamantes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garibay Romero v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2016cv02587
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Garibay Romero
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gonzalo D. Hernandez v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2016cv03935
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo D. Hernandez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
