Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Phillips v. Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2020cv00039
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Phillips
Respondent:
SSA-Email Notification
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Oakes v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2020cv00135
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Phillip Oakes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Phillips v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2018cv00478
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Hattie E. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hodges v. S.S. et al
as 1:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
Leva June Hodges
Defendant:
Phillip W. Kendrick and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Cole v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
Cole and Darryl Phillip Cole
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Phillips v. Social Security
as 1:2017cv01004
Plaintiff:
Krystal Phillips
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Ward v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2016cv00457
Plaintiff:
Phillip Danny Ward
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bay v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2016cv00221
Plaintiff:
Phillip William Bay
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Phillips v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Tracie M. Phillips
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv01196
Plaintiff:
Gregory Phillips
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
