Social Security Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Skolny v. Social Security Commissioner
as 1:2024cv00889
Plaintiff: Stephen Francis Skolny
Defendant: Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HOOPER v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01900
Plaintiff: STEPHEN JOHN HOOPER
Defendant: Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stephens v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01950
Plaintiff: Jacob Stephens
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Murray v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01892
Plaintiff: Stephen Murray
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kozick v. Kijakazi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01029
Plaintiff: Stephen R. Kozick
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ZABOROWSKI v. KIJAKAZI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01130
Plaintiff: RAYMOND STEPHEN ZABOROWSKI
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Belles v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv02179
Plaintiff: James Stephen Belles
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SCHAEFFER v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv03081
Plaintiff: STEPHEN DAVID SCHAEFFER
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Murray v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01190
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Stephen P. Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LONGO et al v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2020cv00958
Plaintiff: STEPHEN M. LONGO and RICHARD LONGO
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?