Cases 31 - 37 of 37
United States District Court for the District of New Mexico v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2010cv00644
Defendant:
Mark E Hopkins, Sharon J. Hopkins and Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
United States District Court for the District of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Keith Caldwell, Sr. v. United States Tax Court, et al
as 09-5166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith Robert Caldwell, Sr., Doctor
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Tax Court, Peter J. Panuthos, Judge, Douglas Shulman, Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service, Office of Chief Counsel and others
McHaffie v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia et al
as 1:2009cv01148
Plaintiff:
Cecil E. McHaffie
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Thomas Brown, Sharon Barnes Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Matejka v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 8:2008cv01174
Petitioner:
Dennis Matejka
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Chrysler Financial Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
CALDWELL v. UNITED STATES TAX COURT et al
as 1:2008cv01427
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROBERT CALDWELL, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES TAX COURT, PETER J. PANUTHOS, DOUGLAS SHULMAN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ACLU v. US TAX COURT et al
as 2:2007cv01616
Plaintiff:
ACLU, HENRY BRODERICK and DENISE BRODERICK
Defendant:
US TAX COURT and IRS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
United States of America v. New York State Supreme Court, Erie County et al
as 1:2007cv00027
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
New York State Supreme Court, Erie County, Linda Angello, Adam W. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
