Cases 81 - 90 of 101
v. United States Attorney General et al
as 3:2009cv00142
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and United States Attorney Western District of North Carolina
Petitioner:
United Treatment Facility, Inc.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
R. H. Donnelley Corporation v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2009cv00097
Plaintiff:
R. H. Donnelley Corporation
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
R. H. Donnelley Corporation v. United States of America
as 5:2008cv00501
Plaintiff:
R. H. Donnelley Corporation
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CANNON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00639
Plaintiff:
NINA CANNON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
USA v. Hunt, et al
as 7:2008cv00118
Defendant:
Danny Hunt, Brenda Hunt, Timmy Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Greco v. United States of America
as 3:2008cv00345
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Greco
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BAILEY, JR. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00498
Plaintiff:
A. D. BAILEY, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
FROHNAPLE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00387
Plaintiff:
DAVID G. FROHNAPLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MYERS et al
as 1:2008cv00203
Defendant:
PAUL D. MYERS and JUDITH M. MYERS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
KNUCKLES EL-BEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2008cv00151
Plaintiff:
DENEEN RENEE KNUCKLES EL-BEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
