Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP
as 1:2020cv02413
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP
as 1:2020mi00021
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
USA v. Ingram
as 1:2018cv01182
Defendant:
William A. Ingram and William C. Ingram
Plaintiff:
United States and USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Ingram
as 1:2016at00907
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
James W Ingram
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Ingram
as 1:2016cv01663
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
James W Ingram
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Glen Watson, III v. Diana Day Cartee, et al
as 16-6596
Plaintiff:
GLEN C. WATSON, III, Trustee
Third Party - Appellee:
HENRY PRESTON INGRAM
Defendant:
DIANA L. DAY CARTEE, et al
Third Party - Appellant:
ALAN CARTEE
Glen Watson, III v. Diana Day Cartee, et al
as 15-5556
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GLEN C. WATSON, III, Trustee
Defendant - Appellant:
DIANA L. DAY CARTEE and ALAN CARTEE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, acting through the Department of the Treasury, SHARP MECHANICAL, INC., ANDRES VALENZUELA, JR., individually and, dba Andy's Pool Service and others
Defendant - Appellee:
REGIONS BANK
Third Party - Appellee:
HENRY PRESTON INGRAM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v Dennis Ingram
as 2:2008cv00373
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
Dennis Ingram
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
United States of America v. Ingram
as 2:2007cv00169
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
Darrell Jack Ingram
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
