Cases 101 - 110 of 137
BODDAPATI v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2009cv00134
Petitioner:
MANORANJAN BODDAPATI
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL L. AYTES and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
WOLDESEMAYAT et al v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2009cv00107
Plaintiff:
MELKAMU WOLDESEMAYAT and TIGIST HAGOS
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MICHAEL AYTES and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Castano v. Chertoff et al
as 6:2008cv02116
Plaintiff:
Carlos Andres Castano
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, David Roark, Jonathan Scharfen and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lin v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2008cv02220
Plaintiff:
Zhen Yi Lin
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Aytes, Daniel M Renaud and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MAGANTI et al v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv02107
Plaintiff:
JEEVANA MAGANTI and SRUTHI MAGANTI
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Singh et al v. Roark et al
as 2:2008cv02734
Plaintiff:
Hardip Singh, Harkamal Singh and Sukhjeet Kaur
Defendant:
David Roark, F. Gerard Heinauer, Jonathan Scharfen and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Syed v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv06457
Plaintiff:
Shad Ahmed Syed
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey and David Roark
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
KURRA v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv01903
Petitioner:
SRINIVASAN KURRA
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, CONDOLEEZZA RICE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ZHANG v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv04907
Plaintiff:
BINZHI ZHANG
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, JONATHAN SCHARFEN and DAVID ROARK
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Janvisoft, Inc. v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2008cv04658
Plaintiff:
Janvisoft, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Paul Novak and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
