Cases 111 - 120 of 1,167
Brining v. South Jersey Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03384
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brining
Defendant:
South Jersey Industries, Inc., Joseph M. Rigby, Sarah M. Barpoulis and others
Clarke v. Meyer et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Kevin Meyer, Shelley Hughes, Tom Begich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kaufmann v. South Jersey Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03255
Plaintiff:
David Kaufmann
Defendant:
South Jersey Industries, Inc., Sarah M. Barpoulis, Victor A. Fortkiewicz and others
Hopkins v. Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02258
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc., James S. Metcalf, Rose Lee and others
WHITFIELD v. CONERSTONE BUILDING BRANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01547
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
CONERSTONE BUILDING BRANDS, INC., JAMES S METCALF, ROSE LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Finger v. South Jersey Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03226
Plaintiff:
Katherine Finger
Defendant:
South Jersey Industries, Inc., Sarah M. Barpoulis, Victor A. Fortkiewicz and others
JUSTICE, II v. SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01495
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES, INC., JOSEPH M RIGBY, MICHAEL J RENNA and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
PRZYBOROWSKI v. SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02202
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PRZYBOROWSKI
Defendant:
SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES, INC., JOSEPH M. RIGBY, SARAH M. BARPOULIS and others
Stein v. Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02981
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc., James S. Metcalf, Rose Lee and others
Hopkins v. South Jersey Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01972
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
South Jersey Industries, Inc., Joseph M. Rigby, Michael J. Renna and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
