Other Statutes Cases
Cases 111 - 119 of 119
In re: Universal Electronics, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1716
Appellant: In re: UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC.
Appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Universal Electronics, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1718
Appellant: In re: UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC.
Appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Miller We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1599
Appellant: In re: TONIA WALSTAD MILLER
Appellee: ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
AdamsIn re: Adams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1705
Appellant: In re: PHILLIP M. ADAMS
Appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Gilbert Hyatt v. Vidal
as 19-1039
Cross Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Gilbert Hyatt v. Vidal
as 18-2390
Cross Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Gilbert Hyatt v. Vidal
as 19-1038
Cross Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Gilbert Hyatt v. Vidal
as 19-1049
Cross Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Gilbert Hyatt v. Vidal
as 19-1070
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Cross Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?