Cases 111 - 120 of 334
Waterman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv07194
Interested Party:
Bershire Hathaway Inc
Plaintiff:
Frank L Waterman
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Waterman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv07192
Interested Party:
Bershire Hathaway Inc
Plaintiff:
Frank L Waterman
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Apex Toxicology, LLC v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 0:2017cv61840
Plaintiff:
Apex Toxicology, LLC
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance Company , United Healthcare Services, Inc. , United Healthcare Service LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fosdick v. Wells Fargo Company et al
as CAN/3:17-cv-05111
Plaintiff:
Duane Fosdick
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Company , Well Fargo Bank, N.A. and National General Insurance Company
Fosdick v. Wells Fargo Company et al
as 3:2017cv05111
Plaintiff:
Duane Fosdick
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Company, Well Fargo Bank, N.A. and National General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Thomas v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 1:2017cv06582
Plaintiff:
Juan A Thomas
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., National General Holdings Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv04995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Conklin v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2017cv04975
Plaintiff:
Gene Conklin
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., d/b/a Wells Fargo Dealer Services and National General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 3:2017cv04938
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
