Cases 141 - 150 of 218
Dean Himbler Aviles v. Superior Court of California et al
as 2:2016cv01824
Plaintiff:
Dean Himbler Aviles
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Superior Court of California and The People of the State of California
Michael Lynn Waters v. The State Supreme Court of California et al
as 2:2015cv09705
Respondent:
The State Attorney General of California and The State Supreme Court of California
Petitioner:
Michael Lynn Waters
Kent Craig v. State Supreme Court of California
as 2:2015cv06118
Petitioner:
Kent Craig
Respondent:
State Supreme Court of California
Remmert v. United States et al
as 3:2015mc80178
Plaintiff:
Shirley V. Remmert
Defendant:
United States, San Mateo County and Superior Court of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Russell v. Superior Court of California, County of Sonoma
as 4:2015cv01604
Plaintiff:
Derek Russell
Defendant:
Superior Court of California, County of Sonoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hopson v. The People of the Superior Court of California
as 3:2015cv00508
Plaintiff:
Shannon R. Hopson
Defendant:
The People of the Superior Court of California
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
The Whitehead Clan Foreign Trust vs. Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2014mc01009
Respondent:
Sherri R. Carter, Gregory C. Drapac and Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles
Claimant:
The Whitehead Clan Foreign Trust
James Earl Brown v. James E Brown and Associates, APC et al
as 2:2014cv08841
Defendant:
Paterno Almendral, Frederick H. Alschuler, Emma Arella and others
Plaintiff:
James Earl Brown
Glenn Henderson v. Town of Hope Mill
as 14-2044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF HOPE MILLS, OTIS WRIGHT, JAMES ROSEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
