Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Asher et al v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00238
Plaintiff:
Cory Feltner, Anna Standafer, Alex Powell and others
Defendant:
Andrews Dairy Store Inc, Lear Corporation Eeds and Interiors, LLC, CP Product LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CLARK v. CHW GROUP, INC.
as 2:2018cv00519
Plaintiff:
Thomas Clark
Defendant:
CHW Group, Inc. d/b/a Choice Home Warranty and CHW GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02623
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00132
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SKYLINE MANOR, INC. v. BUCKLES et al
as 1:2017mc00057
Defendant:
SCOTT A. BUCKLES, CLARKE REALTY, DAN ELLIOTT, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SKYLINE MANOR, INC.
Monhollen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv00245
Plaintiff:
Timberly Clark Monhollen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2017mc00040
Respondent:
MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI, JONATHAN REECE ARMSTRONG, ROBERT LEE ARTHUR and others
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA ANN DEAK
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Defendant:
CASEY COLE KANNENBERG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
