Cases 11 - 20 of 32
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Virga et al
as 2:2010cv01072
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
David James Virga, Mark G. Scribner, III and Paesanos, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
McElroy v. Schultz et al
as 1:2008cv00179
Plaintiff:
Latwahn McElroy
Defendant:
- Schultz, A. W. Kays, Scribner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark W. Rathbun v. L. E. Scribner
as 2:2008cv03339
:
and
Respondent:
L. E. Scribner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glass v. Woodford et al
as 1:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
Donald Glass
Defendant:
J. S. Woodford, Bill Lockyer, Robert Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Scribner
as 1:2004cv05878
Plaintiff:
John E. James, III
Defendant:
A K Scribner, - Beer , J Cantwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro v. Terhune, et al
as 3:1998cv04877
Plaintiff:
Carlos Castro
Defendant:
Cal Terhune , G. Bonnie Garibay , J. Batchelor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MaGee v. Bravo, et al
as 1:2003cv06764
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee
Defendant:
D Bravo, A. Scribner, E. S. Alameida, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burbine v. Scribner
as 2:2004cv01691
Petitioner:
Bradford G Burbine
Respondent:
A K Scribner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glass v. Scribner, et al
as 1:2004cv05953
Plaintiff:
Donald Glass
Defendant:
A K Scribner, K Anderson, C Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Dept of Corrections
as 1:2004cv05742
Plaintiff:
Charles Jones
Defendant:
R J Gonzales , J Mendoza , A. K. Scribner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.