Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00382
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Carlos Rodriguez Vasquez v. William Barr
as 20-70765
Petitioner:
CARLOS ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ VASQUEZ, AKA Carlos Alberto Vasquez Rodriguez
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
USA v. Alberto Rodriguez
as 20-40053
Defendant / Appellant:
ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ, also known as Copi
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Devin Andrich v. State Bar of Arizona, et al
as 19-16304
Defendant / Appellee:
GIBLIN, Wife, PAT FLANNERY, husband, STATE BAR OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant:
RODRIGUEZ, Spouse, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Doe/Jane Doe TV Reporter and John Doe/Jane Doe TV Reporter spouse, KPNX TELEVISION COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVIN ANDRICH
United States of America v. Jose Alberto Rodriguez
as 2:2019cv05519
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Defendant:
JOSE ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205
Devin Andrich v. State Bar of Arizona, et al
as 19-15681
Defendant / Appellee:
PAT FLANNERY, husband, STATE BAR OF ARIZONA, STACY LYNN SHUMAN, an individual and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Doe/Jane Doe TV Reporter and John Doe/Jane Doe TV Reporter spouse, KPNX TELEVISION COMPANY, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Doe/Jane Doe I-XX and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVIN ANDRICH
Jose Robles-Martinez v. William Barr
as 19-70943
Petitioner:
JOSE ALBERTO ROBLES-MARTINEZ, AKA Alberto Rodriguez-Martinez
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
USA v. Alberto Rodriguez
as 18-10988
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ
Jose Alberto Rodriguez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 2:2018cv00812
Defendant:
Does, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Thomas D. Homan and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Alberto Rodriguez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
