Cases 11 - 20 of 27
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service et al
as 1:2019cv03112
Plaintiff:
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Defendant:
The United States Department of Agriculture and The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service et al
as 1:2018cv04559
Plaintiff:
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Defendant:
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and The United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PETA v. Joshua Stein
as 17-1669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSHUA STEIN, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, CAROL L. FOLT, in her official capacity as Chancellor of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
PETA v. Joshua Stein
as 17-1669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS and others
Amicus Curiae:
WTVD TELEVISION, LLC, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROL L. FOLT, in her official capacity as Chancellor of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH STEIN, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 1:2017cv00912
Plaintiff:
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Habitat for Horses v. Salazar
as 11-4543
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Habitat for Horses, a Texas non-profit Corporation, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, a New York non-profit Corporation, Cloud Foundation, a Colorado non-profit Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Ken Salazar, in his official capacity aas Secretary, United States Department of the Interior, Robert Abbey, in his official capacity as Director, Bureau of Land Management and Kent Walter, in his official capacity as Field Manager, Bureau of Land Management, White River Field Office
Habitat for Horses v. Salazar
as 10-5104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Habitat for Horses, a Texas non-profit corporation, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, a New York non-profit corporation, The Cloud Foundation, a Colorado non-profit corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Ken Salazar, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of the Interior, Robert Abbey, in his official capacity as Director, Bureau of Land Management and Kent Walter, in his official capacity as Field Manager, Bureau of Land Management, White River Field Office
Habitat For Horses et al v. Salazar et al
as 1:2010cv07684
Plaintiff:
Habitat For Horses , American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals , The Cloud Foundation and others
Defendant:
Ken Salazar, Robert Abbey and Kent Walter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
ASPCA, et al v. Ringling Bros, Barnum & Bailey, et al
as 10-7021
Plaintiff - Appellee:
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Animal Welfare Institute, Fund For Animals and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus
Defendant - Appellant:
Feld Entertainment, Inc.
ASPCA, et al v. Ringling Bros, Barnum & Bailey, et al
as 10-7007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Animal Welfare Institute, Fund For Animals and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus and Feld Entertainment, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
