Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Morago v. Thornell, et al.
as 23-1165
Petitioner: JALEN RAMON MORAGO
Respondent: RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, JOHN MATTOS and KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gerow v. United States Department of Justice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01059
Plaintiff: Eric Gerow
Defendant: United States Department of Justice, Phoenix, City of, Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Kristin Mayes, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-15234
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee: KRISTIN K. MAYES, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, JENNIFER CUNICO, o in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor: BEN TOMA and WARREN PETERSEN
Pitre v. Pacheco
as 22-1911
Petitioner: DWAYNE ALVIN PITRE
Respondent: DAVID SHINN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, AND REENTRY, MARK BRNOVICH, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL and GLENN PACHECO, WARDEN
Gerow v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 8:2022cv02977
Plaintiff: Eric Gerow
Defendant: U.S. Department of Justice, City of Phoenix, Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
In Re Wells Fargo Collateral Protection Insurance Litigation
as 8:2017ml02797
Defendant: Wells Fargo Auto Insurance Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, Liaison Counsel for Defendants, NATIONAL GENERAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs, Gene Conklin, Bryan Tidwell and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Tianna Membreno
Amicus Curiae: Mark Brnovich, Arizona Attorney General, State of Arizona and Attorneys General of Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Nebraska and Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kilian Hale v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-16794
Plaintiff / Appellant: KILIAN GREGOIRE HALE
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, ADOC Central Office, GLENN PACHECO, Warden of ASPC, Tucson Complex, J. MARTINEZ, Deputy Warden of ASPC, Tucson, Whetstone Unit and others
Arizona Department of Child Sa, et al v. Allegra Green, et al
as 21-16469
Plaintiff / Appellee: ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY, named as Department of Child Services, Arizona state agency and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, named as Arizona Attorney General
Defendant: UNKNOWN PARTY, named as John Doe
Defendant / Appellant: GUY KASONGO TSHIBAKA, an individual - parent of minor children on behalf of G.K., G.A.K., L.A.K., C.G.K., C.A.K., AKA Kasongo Tshibaka and ALLEGRA GREEN, an individual - parent of minor children on behalf of G.K., G.A.K., L.A.K., C.G.K., C.A.K.
Ronnie Todd v. State of Arizona, et al
as 21-16330
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, DBA Ramael Blackwell El, AKA Ramael Blackwell El Trust, DBA Ronnie Ramael Todd
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF ARIZONA, ESTATE OF RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, ESTATE OF RYAN RAMAEL TODD and others
Mark Barquera v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-15844
Petitioner / Appellant: MARK ANTHONY BARQUERA
Respondent / Appellee: SAMUEL ROGERS, Deputy Warden, DAVID SHINN, Director, ADOC and ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?