Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Sutherland et al v. B.R. Funsten & Co. et al
as CAN/3:13-CV-01879
Defendant:
B.R. Funsten & Co
Plaintiff:
Sutherland
B.R. Brookfield Commons No. 1 v. Valstone Asset Management, LLC
as 13-1455
Debtor - Appellant:
In the Matter of: B.R. BROOKFIELD COMMONS NO. 1 LLC and B.R. BROOKFIELD COMMONS NO. 2 LLC
Appellee:
VALSTONE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, in its capacity as Attorney in fact for TS7-E Grantor Trust
ROBERTSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00331
Plaintiff:
TIJUANA ROBERTSON , D.R. , BESSIE THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
DTNA v. USDCLA
as 10-71681
:
In re: DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA LLC, FKA Freightliner, LLC
Petitioner:
DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA LLC, FKA Freightliner, LLC
Respondent:
USDC, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
BRITTANI MELISSA ROSE and B.R. TUCKER, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem Brittani Melissa Rose
Knight v. Jett
as 0:2009cv02293
Plaintiff:
Rayford Knight
Respondent:
B.R. Jett and B.R. Jett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv11420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
B.R. et al v. GOVERNMENT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2007cv00578
Plaintiff:
B.R. and ULYSSA REMPSON
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CLIFFORD B. JANEY and SEED PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
B.R. Adams, et al. v. Norfolk Southern & Railway Co.
as TXS/4:00-CV-03507
Plaintiff:
B.R. Adams
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern & Railway Co.
JAMES, et al v. FRAME, et al
as 3:1994mc00325
Plaintiff:
ALLAN JAMES, EDWARD ASHBAUGH, VICTOR EISSLER and others
Defendant:
SUZANNE FRAME, S.F. INTERNATIONAL INC., SASI INTERNATIONAL, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
