Cases 11 - 16 of 16
LG Display Company, Limited, et al v. Lisa Madigan
as 11-8017
Petitioner:
LG DISPLAY COMPANY, LIMITED, CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION, formerly known as CHI EMI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION, EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
LISA MADIGAN, Attorney General of the State of Illinois
T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 3:2011cv02591
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 2:2011cv00664
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION et al v. SONY CORPORATION et al
as 1:2010mc00535
Petitioner:
CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION and INNOLUX CORPORATION
Respondent:
SONY CORPORATION, TOSHIHIDE HAYASHI, KOKI TSUMORI and others
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd
Crago Corporation, et al v. Sharp Corporation, et al
as 10-80088
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CRAGO CORPORATION, ORION HOME SYSTEMS LLC, NATHAN MUCHNICK, INC. and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
SHARP CORPORATION, SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and others
Robert Kerson, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 10-80087
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ROBERT KERSON, FREDERICK ROZO, MICHAEL FRANCIS AYERS and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC., AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
