Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 457
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02053
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
The Law Offices of Kristina Wildeveld & Associates
as 2:2023cv00143
Defendant: Tracy Lee Hurst, Tracy Lee Castl, Tracy Hurst-Castl and others
Plaintiff: The Law Offices of Kristina Wildeveld & Associates
Devon Earl v. Brandon Harris, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1063
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEVON AUSTIN EARL, sui juris
Defendant / Appellee: BRANDON HARRIS, Badge #2918, in his individual and official capacity as Police Officer of New Castle County Police Department, ALEXANDER PETERSON, in his individual and official capacity as Magistrate of Justice of the Peace Court No. 11, C. TEMPLE, Clerk (New Castle Clerk of the Peace) in her individual and official capacity as Clerk of New Castle County Justice of the Peace Courty No. 11 and others
NLRB v. Alaris Health at Castle Hill, et al
as 22-3472
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: ALARIS HEALTH AT CASTLE HILL, ALARIS HEALTH AT BOULEVARD EAST, ALARIS HEALTH AT HABORVIEW and others
Stoudemire et al v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00086
Plaintiff: BRITTNEY STOUDEMIRE, AMANDA VOSE, LUCINDA JACKSON and others
Defendant: LEE ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brownlow v. Castle Credit Co Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2022cv06982
Plaintiff: Marcia Brownlow
Defendant: Castle Credit Co Holdings LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bey v. New Castle Court of Common Pleas, et al.
as 1:2022cv01575
Plaintiff: Gerald Leon Aikens Bey
Defendant: New Castle Court of Common Pleas, New Castle County Superior Court and Officer Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Washington v. Castle Credit Co Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv03680
Plaintiff: Lakeisha D. Washington
Defendant: Castle Credit Co Holdings, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03675
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
In re: 3M Company
as 22-0505
Petitioner: In re: 3M COMPANY, fka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Respondent: BRIAN ADAMS, ALICE ADAMS, EDWARD ADAMS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?