Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Sloan v. DSW, INC. (DO NOT DOCKET NEW CASE 4:13-cv-1059)
as 4:2013mc01059
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Sloan
Defendant:
DSW, INC.
Elizabeth Drew v. DSW Inc et al
as 8:2012cv00514
Defendant:
DSW Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Drew
DSW V SHOE PAVILION
as 08-1085
Plaintiff-Appellant:
DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc. and DSW, Inc.
Defendant-Appellee:
Shoe Pavilion, Inc.
The Kroger Co. v. Mastercard Inc.
as 1:2006cv00039
Special Master:
James Orenstein
Plaintiff:
The Kroger Co., Albertson's, Inc., Safeway, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mastercard Inc. and Mastercard International Incorporated
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. Public Research Interest Group
Not Classified By Court:
1001 Property Solutions LLC, Temple Eagle Partners LLC, Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Publix Supermarkets, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 1:2005cv04677
Special Master:
James Orenstein
Plaintiff:
Publix Supermarkets, Inc., DSW, Inc., Jetblue Airways Corporation and others
Defendant:
Visa U.S.A. Inc., Visa International Service Association, Mastercard Incorporated and others
Not Classified By Court:
Vicente Consulting LLC and National Federation of Independent Businesses
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
National Association of Convenience Stores et al v. Visa U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2005cv04521
Special Master:
James Orenstein
Plaintiff:
National Association of Convenience Stores, National Association of Chain Drug Stores, National Community Pharmacists Association and others
Defendant:
Visa U.S.A., Inc., Visa International Service Association, Mastercard Incorporated and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. Public Research Interest Group
Not Classified By Court:
1001 Property Solutions LLC, Temple Eagle Partners LLC, Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
