Cases 11 - 18 of 18
United States of America v. Dowe (Brian Gill)
as 15-1444
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sean Dupree, # 82661-053, MDC Brooklyn, P.O. Box 329002, Brooklyn, NY 11232, Derrick Lewis, AKA Boobie, Donald Lewis, AKA Don Don and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Brian Gill, # 82702-053, MDC Brooklyn, Metropolitan Detention Center, P.O. Box 329002 Brooklyn, NY 11232, AKA Brawl, David Gill, AKA Plot and Samuel Waco McIntosh, AKA Samuel McIntosh, AKA Waco
David Gill v. Pablo Villanueva et al
as 8:2013cv01782
Defendant:
Empire Family LP, Ostes Hernandez, VP Investment Corp and others
Plaintiff:
David Gill
GILL et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2013cv00213
Plaintiff:
DAVID GILL , FRIENDS OF DAVID GILL and CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
David Gill et al v. Buck Blessing et al
as 8:2013cv00132
Defendant:
Harriett Beebe, Buck Blessing, Diane Braun and others
Plaintiff:
David Gill, Westmoore Capital LLC, Westmoore Capital Management Inc and others
David Gill v. Matt R Jennings et al
as 8:2012cv02235
Defendant:
Greg Contillo, Michael Cornelius, Shawn Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
David Gill
David Gill v. Active Resources Inc et al
as 8:2012cv02236
Plaintiff:
David Gill
Defendant:
Active Resources Inc, Ceralta Medical Institute Inc, Michael Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Gill et al v. Roldan
as 1:2008cv00525
Plaintiff:
David Gill and Madelyn Gill
Defendant:
Sonia Roldan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gill et al v. Roldan
as 1:2007mi00395
Plaintiff:
David Gill and Madelyn Gill
Defendant:
Sonia Roldan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
