Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Derrick Wheatt, et al v. City of East Cleveland, OH, et al
as 20-4018
Defendant / Appellant:
KAREN PERRY, Executor of Michael Perry's Estate
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAURESE GLOVER, DERRICK WHEATT and EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, OH
Fingal Johnson v. Duane Allen, et al
as 19-2250
Defendant / Appellee:
ELLIOT HARDY, DDS, J. CHOI, DDS, Acting Regional Director and DUANE ALLEN, DDS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FINGAL EUGENE JOHNSON
USA v. Darrell Johnson
as 19-13245
Defendant / Appellant:
DARRELL EUGENE JOHNSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Derrick Wheatt, et al v. City of East Cleveland, et al
as 19-3576
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAURESE GLOVER, DERRICK WHEATT and EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN C. BRADFORD, CHARLES TEEL and D. J. MIKLOVICH
Defendant / Appellant:
VINCENT K. JOHNSTONE, CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, OH and MICHAEL C. PERRY
Jason McGehee, et al v. Nebraska Dept. of Corr. Svcs.
as 19-1770
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Stacey Eugene Johnson, Jason Farrell McGehee, Bruce Earl Ward and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Johnson v. Bank Of America et al
as 4:2018cv00538
Plaintiff:
Alvin Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Bank Of America and Charles Cornell
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. ยง 8888
Leslie Eugene Johnson v. San Bernardio County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 5:2018cv00038
Defendant:
15 Unknown Names, A. Anolin, A. Anolin and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Eugene Johnson
USA v. Sanford Johnson, III
as 17-15259
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SANFORD EUGENE JOHNSON, III
Fullerton Trust No 5831 v. Demetrius Camper et al
as 8:2017cv01224
Defendant:
Demetrius Camper and Brian Eugene Johnson
Plaintiff:
Fullerton Trust No 5831
In re: Raymond Johnson
as 16-11531
Petitioner:
In re: RAYMOND EUGENE JOHNSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
