Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 319
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC et al v. Leissner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv05266
Petitioner: Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., The and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Respondent: Tim Leissner
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 203 Jurisdiction; amount in controversy
Zaerpour v. Bank of America Corporation
as 23-845
Plaintiff: People of the United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellant: Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant / Appellee: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC and others
Zaerpour et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff: Soheil Zaerpour and The People of the United States of America
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank plc and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: UBS Group AG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Zaerpour v. UBS Group AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07232
Plaintiff: Scheil Zaerpour and Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant: UBS Group AG, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03211
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In re: Michael Krueger
as 22-1067
Petitioner: Michael Krueger
Respondent: Michael Merson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Zhang Zhenming, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and others
In re: Treasury Securities Auc
as 22-943
Plaintiff: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marc Federighi, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Michael St. John, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System, On behalf of itself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: BMO Capital Markets Corp., CIBC World Markets Corp., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and others
City of Providence, Rhode v. Bats Global Markets, Inc.
as 22-920
Plaintiff: Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, Forsta AP-fonden, StateBoston Retirement System and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Providence, Rhode Island, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Employees' Retirement System of the Government of the Virgin Islands, United Association National Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Wedbush Securities, Inc., Tradework Inc., Bids Trading, L.P. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Direct Edge ECN, L.L.C., The Nasdaq Stock Market L.L.C. and others
In re Goldman Sachs Group, Inc
as 22-484
Plaintiff: Pension Funds, Ilene Richman, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Pablo Elizondo and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Arkansas Teachers Retirement System, West Virginia Investment Management Board and Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Group
Defendant: Sarah E. Smith
Defendant / Appellant: Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Lloyd C. Blankfein, David A. Viniar and others
Falberg v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 22-404
Petitioner: The Goldman Sachs 401(k) Plan Retirement Committee, John Does 1-20 and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Respondent: Leonid Falberg, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of The Goldman Sachs 401(k) Plan

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?