Cases 11 - 20 of 399
Ederer v. HomeStreet, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02748
Plaintiff:
Marsha Ederer
Defendant:
HomeStreet, Inc., Mark K. Mason, James R. Mitchell, Jr. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bagal v. Sawant, et al.
as 24-1488
Plaintiff:
ABHIJIT BAGAL
Defendant:
KSHAMA SAWANT, in her official and individual capacities as Councilmember, District 3, of the Seattle City Council, LISA HERBOLD, in her official and individual capacities as Councilmember, District 1, of the Seattle City Council and BRUCE HARRELL, in his official and individual capacities as the Mayor of the City of Seattle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-484
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harrell v. Aquion, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Harrell
Defendant:
Aquion, Inc. doing business as RainSoft, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and A & B Marketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States of America v. Ayers (Smith)
as 23-7119
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMEL SMITH
Joshua Harrell v. USDC-CASJ
as 23-70167
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JOSHUA HARRELL, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, CALIFRONIA STATE UNIVERSITY and others
Petitioner:
JOSHUA HARRELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
BOUCHER et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01432
Plaintiff:
JANET BOUCHER, RONALD BOUCHER, ANTHONY BOWDERY and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
USA v. Renaldo Harrell
as 23-11751
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RENALDO HARRELL
Michael HarrellIn re: Michael Harrell
as 23-11634
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL JAMES HARRELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
